Books & Reports

Asan Report_Space Technology Development_p

Executive Summary

The use of space has become a crucial part of national security and international stability. Today the existence of a national space program is symbolic of a nation’s standing in the regional security setting and also an integral part of military calculations in international security. The use of space is not only a crucial part of national security but also for a country’s economic security.Developed correctly, space technology can lead to positive domestic externalities. With this in mind, it is important to understand the changing landscape of the use of space—how it is being used and developed, and who the stakeholders are. In addition, space security and stability face numerous threats, which may be manmade or natural, and for a variety of reasons. One example of a manmade threat is the widespread testing of anti-satellite weapons (ASAT), which may undermine international security and stability if intentions are not clear. With space technology becoming more widespread, security concerns over dual-use and intent have increased. To mitigate such concerns international cooperation on an agreed legal framework should be developed. While a draft treaty has been presented by China and Russia, there currently is no formal international treaty banning the placement of weapons in space. There are also no international organizations made specifically to negotiate use of space issues.

Space technology cooperation has beneficial effects on national security and international stability. However there are some roadblocks to international cooperation on space technologies, even though it can help with national security priorities. There are different values placed on various space programs, as well as different budget levels. Also, there is still a sense that technologies related to national security have to be maintained control over, so there is Executive Summary some unease about sharing information or collaborating internationally on national security types of programs. Transnational security threats require transnational answers. The multiplication of non-state actors and non-state threats on the international scene demands new measures from national and transnational decision makers. In today’s globalized world, it is mostly not useful to tackle security challenges from a national point of view, since many of these go far beyond national influence and require effective multilateralism in order to be handled appropriately. International cooperation has therefore become crucial in order to respond to today’s global challenges. Space-based intelligence is an important tool to affront this new reality. As an effective example of international space cooperation, the European Union Satellite Center and its use of geospatial information for crisis management is introduced. The EU Satellite Centre takes an important role as an operational entity that provides security-related analysis to support the decision making process. The EU Satellite Center, in particular, has become a very vital part of EU military strategy and national defense due to their high performance and guaranteed operational autonomy. The SatCenter engages in educational training to empower analysts with skills and knowledge and also participates in space and security programs. The existence of the SatCenter, the EU’s only multinational operational entity in the area of space and security, has considerably strengthened the EU’s multilateral approach to conflict management. The increasing relevance of space technology development to states, which carry significant strategic, economic, and commercial implications, is a central
issue in the national security of states. Space power will be instrumental in 21st century Southeast and Northeast Asian diplomacy, strategy, and geopolitics. National security and economic policy makers in the region must begin to treat space power issues as core strategic interests. While space contestation is increasing, given its importance, the world is simultaneously evolving into a multipolar order, where a greater number of forces, ideas, and technologies threaten stability in space cooperation. In this regard, the areas of space development are not exceptional in reducing potential threats and sustaining stability. International society has the most pivotal responsibility to take part in this ongoing progress. Under these circumstances, the importance of strong policymaking, statesmanship, and cooperation both at the national, international, and industrial level should be stressed. This endeavor is a decades-long process in which all the related entities and actors must contribute with practical solutions.

With the escalation of space competition among four nations of Northeast Asia, Korea has launched a rigorous space technology development program since the 1980s under the strong lead of the national government. In order to create an environment for sustainable space technology development, strong governmental leadership, national economic capability, consensus and a support from the general public, and voluntary investment from the private sector are crucial. Space development in Korea is controlled by the national space development plan that goes up to 2025 with the vision of promoting the peaceful use and scientific exploration of outer space, ensuring national security, and contributing to the growth of the national economy. Korea has been successful with satellite development and finally was able to take full responsibility in KOMPSAT-3 development. With the completion of a test facility in the Naro Space Center, Korea will proceed to obtain the technical capability to become a superpower in space launchers. At a national level, technology policymaking is complicated on account of the relationship with national security. Prioritization and trade-offs that are needed for resource constraints are impediments to successful implementation and sustainable space development.

 

About Experts

박지영
박지영

글로벌 거버넌스센터 / 과학기술정책프로그램, 핵정책기술프로그램

박지영 박사는 아산정책연구원의 글로벌 거버넌스센터장이며 과학기술정책프로그램, 핵정책기술프로그램 선임연구위원이다. 서울대학교에서 핵공학 학사와 석사, 미국 University of Michigan에서 핵공학 박사학위를 취득하였으며 서울대학교 정책학 석사학위도 취득하였다, 2000년부터 2012년까지 한국과학기술기획평가원에 재직하였으며 R&D 타당성조사 센터장을 역임하였다. 주요연구분야는 핵정책, 근거중심 과학기술정책, 과학기술과 안보정책 등이다.